By Commongood Careers
An important aspect of any effective search strategy is the search structure, which refers to the people who will be involved in each hiring process and the roles that they will play. Developing an appropriate structure for each search will ensure that the hire is made in accordance with the needs, values, and capacity of your organization.
In developing the search structure, you will want to make sure that the following stages in the search process are appropriately designated:
Generally, the categories of people who may be involved in these various stages include board members and other external constituents, internal hiring managers, administrative support staff, and human resources representatives. Who is involved in each stage depends on the following criteria:
So, what are some options available to you? The following are four commonly used search structures:
Search Committees
Search committees typically comprise five to eight individuals and include representatives from a variety of organizational stakeholders, such as senior management, the board of directors, funders, and organizational members, participants, or alumni. The committee is typically chaired by a board member or whoever will supervise the hire, if different.
Depending on the nature of the hire, internal staff may not be involved. This is especially true for high-level searches for a CEO or executive director, or for any search where information is confidential.
With a search committee, there are typically different roles for different members. At the start of the search, significant work is put into collectively scoping the position, identifying candidates within personal networks, and defining the systems needed to support the search—such as feedback collection and decision making tools. Typically, the committee participants as a group in search-related tasks like interviewing. The committee will also have regular meetings to review top candidates, share feedback, decide on next steps at each stage of the process, and ultimately make a hire.
While the committee members manage the majority of the search directly, it is preferable if there is administrative support available for the logistical aspects of the search, such as posting job descriptions and scheduling interviews.
Single Hiring Manager
In some cases, particularly for nonprofits with small staffs, a single hiring manager will be responsible for the majority of the search-related responsibilities. Typically, this individual is the person who will ultimately supervise the hire. Others might be involved in providing administrative support, but the onus of screening, interviewing, and decision making lies with the hiring manager. To manage a search adequately, a single hiring manager should carve out approximately two hours per day for search-related tasks.
In addition to owning or overseeing the many search-related tasks, the hiring manager is also responsible for communicating with other staff about the status of the search. This communication will help to prepare the organization for the addition of a new staff member and will initiate the onboarding process before the hire is even made.
Group Process
For most hiring processes, a group process will be most appropriate and effective. There are a variety of ways to structure a group hiring process. In some cases, an entire department manages the search; in others, representatives from different functional areas may each own an aspect of the search. For more senior hires, a representative of senior management or even the CEO or executive director should be a member of the hiring team.
Like search committees, group hiring teams require a great deal of up-front planning and preparation, especially when creating systems and tools to facilitate the hiring process. For example, the group must decide how often it will meet, how it will debrief after meeting candidates, and what tools are required for collecting and assessing candidate information.
Groups will divide and conquer tasks, such as posting and sourcing, but may choose to collaborate on other tasks. For example, the group may work together to scope the role and write the job description or to create interview questions and evaluation tools. Typically, each member of the group will be assigned different roles during the actual interviews. In general, the person who will supervise the hire will handle the tasks of extending and negotiating the offer with the chosen candidate.
HR/Hiring Manager Partnership
For organizations with a Human Resources Department, an HR/hiring manager partnership can make for a highly organized and professional search. In these searches, HR can participate in a variety of ways, from providing purely administrative support to acting as a liaison between the hiring manager and the candidate to having decision making input. An HR representative can also act as a neutral third party when it comes time to make an offer and negotiate salaries. Candidates often appreciate the ability to negotiate their offers with someone who will not be supervising them directly.
To help inform what type of structure works best for your organization, consider the benefits and challenges of each search structure outlined in the table below.
This article was written by Commongood Careers and is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
For more information about nonprofit and socially entrepreneurial careers, visit Commongood Careers at http://www.cgcareers.org.